TO: Interested Parties
FROM: David Brock, Founder of Correct The Record
DATE: February 23, 2016
SUBJECT: Bernie Sanders on Gun Violence—Sounds Just Like a Republican
Following the Charleston shooting, President Obama demanded gun reform and warned against waiting. But Republicans like Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio had a different take: don’t “politicize” the issue. Or, put otherwise: let tragedies be tragedies, let loopholes stay loopholes, and wait until the next massacre rolls around so politicians can again not write policy.
If you watched Meet the Press the next day, you’d have seen Bernie Sanders use an identical talking point: “I hope we don’t have to politicize that issue.” This was hardly the first time Sanders echoed Republicans on guns—either in rhetoric or with votes. His updated platform may look like reform but his 35-year record spells “NRA.”
Sanders likes to talk about holding corporate America accountable. But when it comes to gun makers, the Senator’s logic falls flat. How else to explain his vote to side with the NRA to oppose victim liability lawsuits? That’s one less tool for the families of Sandy Hook victims. Or his—count them—five votes against the Brady Bill, a law meant to separate firearms from known criminals? Or his vote to block scientific research on gun violence? These examples go back years.
For those in Charleston, or greater South Carolina, or anyplace else that cares about safety, statements like Sanders’ are cause for concern. And, when it comes time to vote, the Senator’s Republican-like approach to the gun industry should raise alarm bells. On the issue of guns, a vote for Sanders is essentially a vote for Trump. After all, if the potential Democratic President of the United States won’t “politicize” gun violence to stop future gun violence, then who will?
To see Sanders speak Republican, watch the video below. Then read the research.
Gun Control: Bernie Sanders Sounds Like A Republican
Guns Don’t Kill
| The NRA | Bernie Sanders |
|
Old NRA slogan: “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” “Sandy Hook has prompted much-needed conversations about gun control and mental-health care. But it should also be inspiring a serious discussion of nurturers. The people who, both paid and unpaid, are raising the next generation. (They’re mostly women, yes — old gender habits die hard — but certainly not exclusively.) There is some truth to the NRA bumper sticker ‘Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.’ And talking about the role of caregivers in our society is a great way to tackle the second half of that slogan.” [New York Magazine, 12/18/12]
|
Bernie Sanders: “People pull the trigger, not the guns themselves.” “Independent U.S. House candidate Bernard Sanders received a warm welcome from a group of Ludlow sportsmen. […] Sanders said he did not believe ‘gun control is a panacea for the forces of crime.’ ‘People pull the trigger, not the guns themselves,’ he said.” [Rutland Herald, 10/22/90]
|
Gun Control Doesn’t Work
| The NRA | Bernie Sanders |
|
The NRA: “Expanding background checks… will not prevent the next shooting.” “Expanding background checks at gun shows will not prevent the next shooting, will not solve violent crime and will not keep our kids safe in schools. While the overwhelming rejection of President Obama and Mayor Bloomberg’s ‘universal’ background check agenda is a positive development, we have a broken mental health system that is not going to be fixed with more background checks at gun shows. The sad truth is that no background check would have prevented the tragedies in Newtown, Aurora or Tucson. We need a serious and meaningful solution that addresses crime in cities like Chicago, addresses mental health deficiencies, while at the same time protecting the rights of those of us who are not a danger to anyone. President Obama should be as committed to dealing with the gang problem that is tormenting honest people in his hometown as he is to blaming law-abiding gun owners for the acts of psychopathic murderers.” [Statement from the NRA Regarding Toomey-Manchin Background Check Proposal, 4/10/13]
The NRA: “Waiting periods and other laws delaying handgun purchases have never reduced crime.” “Waiting periods and other laws delaying handgun purchases have never reduced crime. Historically, most states with such laws have had higher violent crime rates than other states and have been more likely to have violent crime and murder rates higher than national rates.” [NRA-ILA document, accessed 7/15/15]
|
Bernie Sanders: “Anyone who has any illusions that gun control will cause a significant dent in the very serious problem of crime is mistaken.” “People who believe gun control will slow down the increasing violence in America are wrong, Vermont’s Congressman said Sunday. ‘Anyone who has any illusions that gun control will cause a significant dent in the very serious problem of crime is mistaken,’ said representative Bernard Sanders, I-Vt.” [Rutland Herald, 10/28/91]
Bernie Sanders: [handgun purchase waiting periods don’t address] “the root causes of crime and violence.” “Sanders also said a handgun waiting period would not get at what he called ‘the root causes of crime and violence’ – poverty, poor education and lack of police protection and programs designed to keep young people out of trouble.” [Times Argus, 3/31/91]
2013: Bernie Sanders: “If you passed the strongest gun control legislation tomorrow, I don’t think it will have a profound effect on the tragedies we have seen.” “That could be because Sanders — who first won election to the U.S. House when the National Rifle Association targeted his Republican opponent — has largely opposed federal firearm laws, calling gun control an issue for states to decide. His position seemed to shift in January, when he intimated in a written statement that he’d support federal bans on assault weapons and high-capacity clips proposed by Obama. But in last week’s interview, he seemed to back away again from such measures, saying, ‘If you passed the strongest gun control legislation tomorrow, I don’t think it will have a profound effect on the tragedies we have seen.’ Asked whether he’d vote for an assault-weapons ban if it reached the Senate floor, he said, ‘We’ll see. We’ll see what other things it is part of.’” [Seven Days, 3/13/13]
|
Instant Background Checks
| The NRA | Bernie Sanders |
|
Wayne LaPierre: “We’ve always supported instant background checks.” “At the time of the ad purchase, the NRA was treading carefully on background checks. The group supported the concept, so long as there was no user fee associated with it. It opposed legislation that would allow the government to retain information gleaned from background checks, and pushed for a short time period for the checks. ‘We’ve always supported instant background checks,’ LaPierre declared at a Friends of NRA banquet in South Carolina in May 1999, according to a newspaper archive search. ‘We say if it’s a legitimate gun show — and we define a gun show as 10 or more exhibitors — you have to draw the line somewhere, and I think that’s a — the best way you can draw the line — then we support the check,’ LaPierre said a month later during an interview on Fox News. Asked by the host whether the NRA was protecting gun shows, LaPierre said, ‘That’s ridiculous … I mean, the fact is that we’re supporting the bill in the Senate … that provides a check on every sale at every gun show, no loopholes at all.’” [Huffington Post, 1/31/13]
|
Bernie Sanders: “I have supported from day one the instant background check.” “HOLT: Senator Sanders, last week Secretary Clinton called you quote, “a pretty reliable vote for the gun lobby.” Right before the debate you changed your position on immunity from lawsuits for gun manufacturers, can you tell us why? SANDERS: Well, I think Secretary Clinton knows that what she says is very disingenuous. I have a D-minus voting record from the NRA. I was in 1988, there were three candidates running for congress in the state of Vermont, I stood up to the gun lobby and came out and maintained the position that in this country we should not be selling military style assault weapons. I have supported from day one the instant background check to make certain that people who should have guns do not have guns. And that includes people of criminal backgrounds, people who are mentally unstable. I support what President Obama is doing in terms of trying to close the gun show loop holes and I think it should be a federal crime if people act as dormant (ph).” [Transcript, New York Times via Federal News Service, Democratic Presidential Debate, 1/17/16]
|
Violence in Video Games
| The NRA | Bernie Sanders |
|
Wayne LaPierre: “Our Sandy Hook promise is — is always to make this country safer… I would hope we could convince some of these companies… to stop putting out such incredibly violent video games that desensitize.” “Senator, our Sandy Hook promise is — is always to make this country safer, which is why we’ve advocated immediately putting police, armed security, in schools; fixing the mental health system; computerizing the records of those mentally adjudicated. I would hope we could convince some of these companies that are just — I’m not talking about First Amendment, I know they have a right to do it, to stop putting out such incredibly violent video games that desensitize.” [NPR, 1/30/13]
|
Bernie Sanders: “[I]n terms of how we have to deal with these mass killings… if you look at these video games… there is so much gratuitous violence… It desensitizes you to death and killing.” “[I]n terms of how we have to deal with these mass killings is – you know, I get appalled, and I say that as a father of four and a grandfather of seven – if you look at these video games, if you look at some of the movies out there, some stuff that’s on TV, there is so much gratuitous violence, and I can’t help but think that that just desensitizes children and people in general to what it is about. You know, you have films where people are spraying guns and killing people. It desensitizes you to death and killing.” [Brunch with Bernie, 12/21/12]
|
Waiting Periods
| The NRA | Bernie Sanders |
|
NRA-ILA spokesman: “[waiting periods are] nothing but a needless burden on law-abiding gun owners.” “The National Rifle Association scored another victory for gun rights today when the Wisconsin Assembly passed NRA-backed legislation eliminating a 48-hour waiting period on all point-of-sale handgun purchases in the state. Senate Bill (SB) 35 passed by a voice vote and is headed to the Governor Scott Walker’s desk where it is expected to be signed into law. ‘This important measure marks the end of an antiquated law that’s served as nothing but a needless burden on law-abiding gun owners in the Badger state,’ said Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action. ‘We applaud the state legislature for making the preservation of Second Amendment rights a priority.’” [NRA-ILA, 6/9/15]
|
Bernie Sanders: “[Waiting periods would mean individuals] get[ting] caught up in a bureaucracy when all they wanted to do was go for target practice or something.” “Sanders said Friday he thinks there is a difference between a one-day check and a seven-day check. The longer period could mean a person ‘would get caught up in a bureaucracy when all they wanted to do was go for target practice or something.’’’ [Burlington Free Press, 3/30/91]
|
Assault Weapons Ban
| The NRA | Bernie Sanders |
|
NRA Institute for Legislative Action: The post-Newtown assault weapons ban “wouldn’t reduce crime.” “Contrary to the suggestion of President Obama and others, S. 150 goes far beyond ‘restoring’ or ‘reinstating’ the 1994 ban. S. 150 is the biggest proposed gun and magazine ban in American history. It would undermine the right of people to use firearms for self-defense, and that alone is sufficient reason to reject it. It also wouldn’t reduce crime. Studies—which Sen. Feinstein plainly misquotes—show that her previous ban didn’t reduce crime, in part because criminals rarely use ‘assault weapons’ and rarely fire more than a few shots.” [NRA-ILA, 2/5/13] |
Bernie Sanders said that the post-Newtown assault weapons ban would not “have a profound effect on the tragedies we have seen.”“His position seemed to shift in January, when he intimated in a written statement that he’d support federal bans on assault weapons and high-capacity clips proposed by Obama. But in last week’s interview, he seemed to back away again from such measures, saying, ‘If you passed the strongest gun control legislation tomorrow, I don’t think it will have a profound effect on the tragedies we have seen.’ Asked whether he’d vote for an assault-weapons ban if it reached the Senate floor, he said, ‘We’ll see. We’ll see what other things it is part of.’” [Seven Days, 3/13/13]
|
Gun Control Analogies
| The NRA | Bernie Sanders |
|
Pro-NRA Congressman: “If we are going to pass tough gun control laws to prevent people from killing people, why do we not look at passing laws to outline knives, or hammers or other weapons?” Mr. SARPALIUS. ‘Madam Chairman, this amendment has bothered me, the Brady bill, for quite some time because I feel very strongly that it goes against the very belief of the second amendment. And I contacted the Archives, and I asked for some research work on the debate that was said at that time when Samuel Adams made the motion for that particular amendment. During that debate it was made clear that every American citizen should have the right to own and bear their own arms, to protect themselves. Now we can pass tough gun control laws. Look at which city has the toughest gun control laws in the country. It is this one, Washington, DC. But what city has more murders than any other city? It is this one, Washington, DC. If we are going to pass tough gun control laws to prevent people from killing people, why do we not look at passing laws to outline knives, or hammers or other weapons? I think it is important that all of us as American citizens and as Members of this body should do everything we can to help protect that precious amendment that our forefathers gave us in the right of protecting ourselves.’ [Rep Sarpalius floor remarks, 11/10/1993]
Pro-NRA Congresswoman: “Why aren’t proponents of bans on firearms calling baseball bats assault baseball bats?” ‘The fact is that more deaths have been inflicted using fists and knives and baseball bats than with a gun. In fact, one-and-a-half times as many homicides are committed with blunt objects such as a baseball bat, over two times as many homicides with fists, and five times as many with knives. So why aren’t proponents of bans on firearms calling baseball bats assault baseball bats or assault knives? Well, the reason is because the American people know that objects are only tools of people who wish to do others harm. They are not the cause. Now, it’s a slogan, it’s a bumper sticker, but it is true: guns don’t kill people; people do.’ [Rep Hartzler remarks, 4/25/13]
|
Bernie Sanders: “[holding gun manufacturers responsible for gun violence was like] hold[ing] a hammer company responsible if somebody beat somebody over the head with a hammer.” TAPPER: Earlier this year, the parents of one of the 12 innocent people killed during the Aurora movie theater shooting, they saw their lawsuit to hold ammunition sellers liable for the attack, they saw that dismissed. And one of the reasons was a law that you voted for which protects manufacturers of firearms and ammunition from being sued. Why did you vote that way? SANDERS:[…] Now, the issues that you’re talking about is, if somebody has a gun and it falls into the hands of a murderer, and that murderer kills somebody with the gun, do you hold the gun manufacturer responsible? Not anymore than you would hold a hammer company responsible if somebody beat somebody over the head with a hammer. That is not what a lawsuit should be about.” [CNN, 7/5/15]
Bernie Sanders: “If somebody sells you a baseball bat and you hit somebody over the head you’re not going to sue the baseball bat manufacture?” “SANDERS: Oh this Amtrak thing… Let me tell you about this Amtrak thing it’s a very good example. Yeah I voted— Oh the gun thing. The gun… ah… manufacturers. Yeah– you know what? Yes you’re right that’s how I voted. Why did I vote that way? Because if somebody has a gun and somebody steals that gun and they shoot somebody, do you really think it makes sense to blame the manufacture of that weapon? ASKER: Yes and I’ll tell you why. SANDERS: Well…. [Crosstalk] Okay, the point is that I made is that if somebody sells you a baseball bat and you hit somebody over the head you’re not going to sue the baseball bat manufacturer.” [Bernie Sanders, 7/9/15]
|
Gun Control: Bernie Sanders Has Voted Like a Republican
Bernie Sanders voted against the Brady Bill multiple times
May 1991: Bernie Sanders voted against the Brady Bill mandating a seven-day waiting period for background checks that passed the House. [H R 7, Vote # 83, 5/8/91]
November 1991: Bernie Sanders voted against the Brady Bill mandating a five-day waiting period for background checks that passed in the House. [H R 3371, Vote #443, 11/26/91]
November 1993: Bernie Sanders voted against the Brady Bill mandating a five-day waiting period for background checks that passed in the House. [H R 1025, Vote #564, 11/10/93]
November 1993: Bernie Sanders voted against the final version of the Brady Bill mandating a five-day waiting period for background checks that was signed into law. [H R 1025, Vote #614, 11/22/93]
Sanders voted to create the Charlestown Loophole
Bernie Sanders voted for the Gekas Amendment to the Brady Bill. On November 10, 1993, Bernie Sanders supported a Rep. Gekas, R-Pa., amendment to sunset the five-day waiting period five years after enactment. A majority of House Democrats opposed the proposal. Adopted 236-198: R 139-36; D 96-162; I 1-0. [H.Amdt.390 to H.R. 1025, Vote #559, 11/10/93; CQ Floor Votes, 11/10/93]
The Gekas amendment created a “default proceed” loophole to allow a gun to be purchased if a background check did not return a result within one business day. “(ii) 1 business day (as defined in subsection (s)(8)(B)) has elapsed since the end of the business day on which the licensee contacted the system, and the system has not notified the licensee that the receipt of the handgun by such other person would violate subsection (g) or (n) of this section or any State or local law.” [H.Amdt.390 to H.R.1025, Vote #559, 11/10/1993]
The three-day default proceed loophole allowed Dylan Roof to obtain a gun. “Mr. Roof exploited the three-day waiting time that has allowed thousands of prohibited buyers to legally purchase firearms over the past decade — and some of those weapons were ultimately used in crimes, according to court records and government documents.” [New York Times, 7/11/15]
Bernie Sanders voted against an amendment to restore CDC funding to research firearm use
Bernie Sanders voted against the Lowey-Castle amendment. On July 11, 1996, Bernie Sanders opposed a Rep. Lowey, D-N.Y., amendment to provide an additional $2.6 million for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in order to fund research at the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control on issues related to firearms use and to reduce by an equal amount the $3.1 billion in funding for health resources and services. A majority of House Democrats supported the proposal. Rejected 158-263: R 36-193; D 122-69; I 0-1. [H.Amdt.1256 to H.R.3755, Vote #302, 7/11/96; CQ Floor Votes, 7/11/96]
Sanders Voted to shield gun makers from lawsuits following gun related crimes in 2003 and 2005
Sanders voted for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) which, “shields gun makers and dealers from most liability when their firearms are used criminally.” “But Sanders’ vote for a different kind of pro-gun bill is more puzzling—and profoundly disturbing. In 2005, a Republican-dominated Congress passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). This law doesn’t protect gun owners; it protects gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers. The PLCAA was the No. 1 legislative priority of the National Rifle Association for years, because it shields gun makers and dealers from most liability when their firearms are used criminally. It is one of the most noxious pieces of pro-gun legislation ever passed. And Bernie Sanders voted for it.” (Sanders’ campaign has not replied to a request for comment.)’ [Slate, 5/6/15, House Roll Call 534, 10/20/05]
Bernie Sanders voted for the 2003 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms (PLCAA). House Vote 124 – HR 1036: Gun Liability – Passage April 09, 2003 – Passage of the bill that would block liability lawsuits against gunmakers and sellers based on the criminal misuse of firearms. It also would block such actions against gun trade organizations and against ammunition makers and sellers. The measure would apply immediately to any pending cases. Several specific exceptions to the ban exist and include allowing civil suits against a maker or seller who ‘knowingly and willfully violated’ state or federal laws in selling or marketing a weapon. Design and manufacturing defect lawsuits also would be allowed when weapons are ‘used as intended.’ Passed 285-140: R 221-3; D 63-137; I 1-0. [CQ Vote Report: House Vote 124, 4/9/03]
